What, you want a recap?
You lack any commitment to reality. Or at least have a penchant for sensationalism. Or you're just really fucking sloppy when you post. Sure, Angelina Jolie being crazy and into "odd things" would be quite intriguing for those gossip-minded on here, but be prepared to justify such propositions with more reliable sources than tabloid newspapers and suspect blogs. Otherwise you could always say, "I heard rumours that she's struggled with some minor mental disturbances, but to me that only adds to her mystery," instad of, "She's obviously still insane."
You back pedal. A lot. First she's insane. And apparently she's insane because some nanny told DM that she used to have mild anorexic tendencies. But it's not so obvious maybe, as you don't know her personally and can't say 100% for sure. It would make sense that she's insane though, because she played an "insane" girl once. But you're only joking though! She's obviously not insane. Except she is, but it's her BPD that makes her so. And btw, you didn't actually say she was insane you said she is a crazy girl and that you love her for it. Here are screen grabs of the first four Google hits when you search for "Angelina Jolie + bpd"*. But like, it's actually not the BPD that makes her insane. She's just insane in general. But apparently you don't feel particularly devoted to conventional speech, so when you say "insane", you actually just mean open to new things. It's not rude at all! But she is still mentally ill, of course. Of course.
*Why screenshots and not links? Do you perhaps realize the lack of credibility your sources lend your claim?
And then there's your offhand remark that I'm syntehsizing conflict to impress other members on SGF, implying that either a) I'm twelve years old, or b) you lack a coherent understanding of how you come across in this discussion. Either way, I am actually sorry to be a bitch, but grandiose displays of stupidity like yours merit just that kind of response.