Okay I know this is a really old post but I am obsessed with Gail Carriger's work and kind of want to weigh in on the subject.
Honestly, I found the fact that Alexia wasn't conventionally pretty (by the fictional society's standards) to be
so refreshing. I could sort of relate to her-when your face isn't anything special, you kind of just have to suck it up and deal with it (though there's always make-up nowadays
). And although I myself aspire to be skinny-skinny, I am 100% for body positivity, as long as it promotes
healthy lifestyles/weights and includes everyone (fat, skinny, in between, whatever). So Alexia being more "curvaceous" was actually more of a plus to me.
In regards to how Carriger constantly mentions her appearance, I actually think it's intentional. Victorian society was
very focused on outer appearances, especially in terms of how they regarded women, and I think the repeated descriptions of Alexia were meant to highlight that. It felt more like satiric irony to me. I don't know-I could be totally wrong, but that's just my two cents
Alright, back on topic
I honestly don't like Emilia Clarke's outer appearance as Dany, but as long as the acting is good I'm all for it. Dany is described as being rather slender in the books, and Emilia Clarke, well...isn't. Again, I'm all for body positivity, but I also like accurate representation.
I can't argue with her acting, though. From what I've seen, it's awesome! And I
guess that's what really matters at the end of the day...how well an actor/actress
acts.
What a gorgeous face though
EDIT: And I agree that she would look 10 times better if she toned up. She'd look so much more badass