I think that outfit hid her waist. Its cute but they should have gotten rid of that fluff area and just kept the whole thing see through.
Her waist so so iconic, why hide it!?
Her waist so so iconic, why hide it!?
Agree. There was many other girls this time who would've benefitted from that top instead..
'Sixties-Inspired Sreen Tests' by CR Fashion Book Online (November 2018)
Real life barbie.
Real life barbie.
It was a video, or else I would have screenshotted
here it is on another page, hopefully this one survives?!?!
At Laquan Smith- unfortunate for her that the outfit completely coves up her waist and focuses on her legs instead.
She made sure we saw that her legs look better in motion.
Her face is enough to distract me.
holy shit *printing it out and sticking it on my fridge*
I think she is a classic pear. She must be the master of posing to make her thighs and hips look skinnier because, while her arms always seem to look good, here is a more objective shot showing that her lower half is softer and fuller than other pictures may suggest.
It’s like her hips and thighs belong to a completely different person
Given that she’s 5’9 (she looks shorter though but I think that’s just the legs), 110? It’s hard to say— she’s small but just looks... idk... heavy. Not even in a bad way. But yeah I’d say 110lbs as a rough, maybe generous, estimate.
Thank you. Lol the lower I get, the farther I realize I am. But that does seem to line up with a few other models with similar stats.
I'm 5'9 and 110 and have entirely different weight distribution than Frida but it still seems plausible. She might be 115 at the highest if she has a bit of muscle mass- I agree with @stargirl that she "looks heavy", not fat or out of shape, just I guess looks natural/not emaciated at all at low weights?
she might not be the ultimate skinny, but I will admit I have a soft spot for Frida - she looks lovely