Perhaps I phrased it in a wrong way. I completely support in vitro, what I meant is that it is a scientific ("not natural" was meant as in "created by man") process, but it does not mean that it is wrong, bad, or shouldn't be done. If I needed to have IVF, I'd do it, and it's great that we have options like this nowadays.
In my comment, I didn't mean that in vitro is radical (it's not), that referred to the completely different issue of homosexual couples having babies. Again, I personally approve, but my point was that in many parts of Europe, especially traditional ones such as Sicily and countries of the Eastern Europe, idea of gay couples having kids and raising them without a mother figure is considered radical and shocking. The point is, it's those people's personal, private opinion, which they have a right to express when asked.
(http://edition.cnn.com/2015/03/18/world/dolce-gabbana-ivf/) Maybe I'm wrong and they are truly ignorant, but it seems that a lot of it comes to down to the initial poor choice of words.
Anyway, I didn't want to offend you @espressoenthusiasm , all I meant is that after reading actual in-depth interviews with D&G I came to a personal conclusion that media are blowing this out of proportion.
I used to love D&G...
