Kendall at Jacquemus. Even Bella looked better but they did cover up her arms.
View attachment 106126
Is this the "Girls who think they're models" thread?
Kendall at Jacquemus. Even Bella looked better but they did cover up her arms.
View attachment 106126
She cannot dress but this format makes no sense to me? Alexa Chung is someone I think has a good fashion style, Camille Rowe too and of course that kind of style works because of their phisique too? The bigger you are, fewer are the things you can actually wear that will look good on you and will be flattering, even if they are fashion pieces. Let’s not act like someone’s body doesn’t play a big part in what they wear and how they wear itSaw this today. Kendull is far from SG skinny, but this woman still has a point...
- YouTube
Enjoy the videos and music you love, upload original content, and share it all with friends, family, and the world on YouTube.youtube.com
The bigger you are, fewer are the things you can actually wear that will look good on you and will be flattering, even if they are fashion pieces. Let’s not act like someone’s body doesn’t play a big part in what they wear and how they wear it
Sorry, what? But that was the point of the video, you're literally saying the same thing?but this format makes no sense to me?
I guess the point of the video was to dismiss some of these girls fashion ‘style’ saying that they aren’t fashion icons, but just look good in basic fashion cause theyre skinny. How are we saying the same thing? It’s a format made to ‘call out’ skinny girls, basicallySorry, what? But that was the point of the video, you're literally saying the same thing?
The bigger you are, fewer are the things you can actually wear that will look good on you and will be flattering
Let’s not act like someone’s body doesn’t play a big part in what they wear and how they wear it
the point of the video was to dismiss some of these girls fashion ‘style’ saying that they aren’t fashion icons, but just look good in basic fashion cause theyre skinny
How are we saying the same thing?
The girls making this type of format aren’t here to highlight the fact that skinny people look good in anything and fat people don’t, lol. They try fits that models wear to see if it’s actual ‘fashion’ or just clothes that they make look good cause of their body/have no actual style. This is what I find stupid.Yes, you are saying the same thing and that is how.
This is what I find stupid.
But of course it works this way? An outfit on a skinny person appears more desiderable, this is literally why models have to be skinny…How so? I agree with @longlegz - the girl in the video has a point. I certainly wouldn’t describe Kendall Jenner as a “fashion icon” but because she’s “skinny” (by mainstream standards) she is considered as such. Most of her outfits are basic and boring af. Whilst we can all agree that a skinny body looks good in almost everything, just because you’re skinny doesn’t mean you are fashionable or even have a good sense of style.
For those that can’t be bothered watching the video, it’s basically an expansion of this viral Twitter post (except the girl replicating the outfits isn’t obese):
View attachment 106247
But of course it works this way? An outfit on a skinny person appears more desiderable, this is literally why models have to be skinny…
But still I do agree with the fact that a body makes an outfit, too. Nothing shocking to me about these videos, honestlyWell obviously. Like the video, I’m making a distinction btw an outfit looking good on a person VS the outfit itself actually being good. There’s a difference.
Like I said before, Camille Rowe to me is someone who has an actual style unlike Kendall Jenner, she wears outfits that are more interesting than a pair of jeans and a brandy Melville top. Still, would her outfits work on a bigger person? I don’t think so, no. This doesn’t make her less than a fashion girl.
She is on the cover of the US Elle, August 2021.
Again her lifeless, dull facial expression, but this time she has a new hairstyle (which I personally do not like). I don't want to be mean but honestly, she really reminds me a bit of a rat...
View attachment 106841
View attachment 106842
View attachment 106843
View attachment 106844
View attachment 106845
View attachment 106846View attachment 106847
Something about her eye shape looks very different here?She is on the cover of the US Elle, August 2021.
Again her lifeless, dull facial expression, but this time she has a new hairstyle (which I personally do not like). I don't want to be mean but honestly, she really reminds me a bit of a rat...
View attachment 106841
View attachment 106842
View attachment 106843
View attachment 106844
View attachment 106845
View attachment 106846View attachment 106847
I genuinely don’t understand these. She looks like Kendall maybe 4 years ago pre cantho/bleph, lip fillers, rhino, fill in the blank…She is on the cover of the US Elle, August 2021.
Again her lifeless, dull facial expression, but this time she has a new hairstyle (which I personally do not like). I don't want to be mean but honestly, she really reminds me a bit of a rat...
View attachment 106841
View attachment 106842
View attachment 106843
View attachment 106844
View attachment 106845
View attachment 106846View attachment 106847
At this point, I would just like to know who actually comes up with the idea to use Kendall as a model. Whoever is doing this job is clearly not aware of all those gorgeous and skinny models with striking, interesting facial features who genuinely deserve to land a cover.
But regarding the shoot, I'm not even sure where to start. The background looks like a poor edit from Adobe Photoshop, this fat old woman who clearly cannot keep her back up anymore, wearing rain boots and some pieces of black fabric and on top eyebrows that look like they're from 2016?
Not to mention, that the Title is 'Revolución'
Apparently, the cover wasn't enough so therefore, take care of your eyes while looking at the editorial.
Vogue España August 2021 Cover
View attachment 107277
View attachment 107278View attachment 107279View attachment 107280View attachment 107281View attachment 107282View attachment 107283View attachment 107284View attachment 107285View attachment 107286