Vogue Japan July 2020.. Absolutely no energy, let alone 'positive energy'!
Also rather unfortunate that the placement and colour of that bicycle seat looks like the head of a penis.
Vogue Brasil April 2021
Pardon the intrusion in this thread—this isn’t a Vogue cover and Kacey isn’t a model—but what the utter fuck did they do to her body in photoshop?? !?
Yikes.
Donatella Versace for Vogue Italia March 2022
View attachment 122969
And as if this cover wasn’t bad enough, here’s this paragraph that’s just a plain offense for the modeling world. I don’t who’s worse, Donatella or the fat nepo “models” she insists on pimping out
View attachment 122971
Uh... I don't even know what to say.
Well. There’s only so much they have to work with when celebrities now don’t think they need to lose weight for any job anymore and they should just be accepted as they are. On the other side of the token, I understand being thin doesn’t automatically make it interesting, but god it’d definitely help make it easier on the eyes and give me something to focus on.View attachment 142179
Is this Vogue or Cosmopolitan?
After finally realising it was Margot Robbie after staring at it long enough - I am still so confused about where they were going with this... I get that it's Barbie promotional material, but does that excuse the uncanny editing; her eyes are almost going in different directions. It's not atrocious, but it is boring. I love a good pink, but if they wanted to do some homage to Barbie I wish they could've used literally any other iconic memorabilia.
View attachment 142178View attachment 142180
These pictures are significantly more interesting and have a deeper sense of character, and that Barbie "permanent" heel. Looking past the only real downside (Margot Robbie's lacklustre figure) I feel that these would've been a much better stylistic choice.