Natalia Dyer

I think that the colour setting or filter or whatever used in Stranger Things leeches the colour out of the scenes to give it a more 70s vibe, which may contribute to her skin looking a bit dull and other things people have said on here. Also she is definitely, definitely pear shaped - her upper body may verge on looking almost sickly but her legs aren't the same. Assuming an eating disorder isn't fair.

Yes this - they were supposed to look unwell. ST used a greenish filter to set the era and the eerie mood, and it definitely impacted the cast's general appearance (Winona looked pretty ill too, which was of course appropriate for her character). Natalia looks great in interviews, IMO.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: 1 users
image.png
She's so freaking cute!
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
I'm a little late to hop on the bandwagon but I finally just began stranger things and she is adorable! I'm hooked on the show and I love her in it. She's the only one pulling off those 80's outfits because she's so tiny :luv:
 
  • Agree
Reactions: 1 users
475197020.jpg

This is Natalia in a picture from 2014. Her legs look pretty thick/normal here. However, her face still looks fairly angular and her top half is thin. According to a quick search online, she's 5'4". I know the downward angle here skews things, but her head still looks pretty big here in proportion to her body.

All I'm trying to say is, I think she's most likely just thin, not overly thin.
It's unfortunate that she tends to look a little sunken in the face and a little disproportionate, but I'm pretty sure it's just the way she stores fat and the fact that she has a bit of a big head.
Whatever.
This all sounds a bit insulting so far, but I really do think she's stunning. I have a friend who has a face similar to hers- super gaunt, but her hips are about mine and a half around. Every body's different.
 
475197020.jpg

This is Natalia in a picture from 2014. Her legs look pretty thick/normal here. However, her face still looks fairly angular and her top half is thin. According to a quick search online, she's 5'4". I know the downward angle here skews things, but her head still looks pretty big here in proportion to her body.

All I'm trying to say is, I think she's most likely just thin, not overly thin.
It's unfortunate that she tends to look a little sunken in the face and a little disproportionate, but I'm pretty sure it's just the way she stores fat and the fact that she has a bit of a big head.
Whatever.
This all sounds a bit insulting so far, but I really do think she's stunning. I have a friend who has a face similar to hers- super gaunt, but her hips are about mine and a half around. Every body's different.

Actually I think she has lost weight compared to this picture. Her face is chubbier and so are her legs. Looks like a pear.
 
Actually I think she has lost weight compared to this picture. Her face is chubbier and so are her legs. Looks like a pear.
She lost a ton of weight. What I was trying to say is that some people worry that she might have an ED or is too thin because her face is especially angular, but I was posting this old picture as a comparison to say that she just doesn't store a lot of fat in her upper half and face to begin with.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: 2 users
I saw her in New York about a month ago. What other people said is right on, she is definitely a pear. She was wearing a shortish dress and even with platform booties her legs didn't look super-skinny. Her thighs were not big, but not skinny - like slim/healthy. Her upper body looked almost model skinny though - xylo / collarbone were on fleek.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
I thought it was how she was sitting/angle. At least I hope so....she's looks so good when she's skinny!
natalia-dyer-hair-change-s2-stranger-things-afi-01.jpg
natalia-dyer-hair-change-s2-stranger-things-afi-02.jpg
natalia-dyer-hair-change-s2-stranger-things-afi-09.jpg


These are from 3 days ago, I think.

It looks like she's gotten a bit softer. It comes as no surprise, really, after the major backlash against how skinny she was in season 1. It's too bad though, I had high hopes for her.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: 1 users
natalia-dyer-hair-change-s2-stranger-things-afi-01.jpg
natalia-dyer-hair-change-s2-stranger-things-afi-02.jpg
natalia-dyer-hair-change-s2-stranger-things-afi-09.jpg


These are from 3 days ago, I think.

It looks like she's gotten a bit softer. It comes as no surprise, really, after the major backlash against how skinny she was in season 1. It's too bad though, I had high hopes for her.
Her face definitely looks a bit fuller:(
 
  • Agree
Reactions: 1 users
Has she gained here? It seems like her thigh is a bit thicker than what we're used to seeing.
I'm always surprised by her thighs. She's very bottom-heavy - I think that's why she wears so many skirts/dresses.

But yeah, she's not as wiry as she was in those red dress pictures.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: 1 user
I won't be surprised if she lost weight for the show (maybe on her own account or maybe not, it doesn't matter) and was struggling to keep the lbs of. Anyway she should be the size she feels best in of course.
 
SAG Awards 2017
Looking good.
IMG_1376.JPG
IMG_1377.JPG
IMG_1378.JPG

I love both of the characters portrayed by these actresses but I couldn't resist this comparison.
IMG_1379.JPG
 
  • Love
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: 8 users
  • Agree
Reactions: 1 user