My annoyance there is more with whoever decides the best representation of a model is a grayscale pouty snap selfie rather than a polaroid or at least editorial shot, but I guess I'm used to social media-darling models getting special, often questionable treatment in all areas of the industry.
I think it actually makes sense. I mean the insta model phenomen is real, and even though Taylor Hill has actually worked her way the top, I do think we could put all of VS angels/models in the Instagram category along with Bella, Gigi and Kendall. They get special treatments during fashion weeks since most of them are shorter/larger than the average runway model and they're definitely getting their HF jobs due to their popularity on social media. So IMG putting selfies on their show card might be a way to 'categorize' them for their social media fame.
Taylor never has and never will have a 22" waist. 25-27" is more believable at this point given her height.
I'd say at least 26''. I've seen 5'10 people with 25'' waists and they look way better....She has always been a pear though. Would hips 36'' sound right?
I guess when she sees some old pics of herself , starts stuffing her mouth with some Cheetos because of the disappointing change her body went through...
Tonight at Jeremy Scott S/S 2018
so glad you said this, i was afraid to.....her legs, while big, don't touch while she walks. However, i'm unsure if this is because they're smaller than I imagined, or because her hipbones/bone structure is wide enough to give them some more room. So many thinner girls have legs that overlap when they walk, so i'm quite surprised that her legs appear to be separated.
She's wearing heels at Jeremy Scott vs flats at Alexander Wang, though. But I do agree that she definitely toned up.Anyways, she definitely toned up a bit.
Last year's fashion week at Alexander Wang:
View attachment 17933
Vs now:
View attachment 17934
very happy she's working on her body again.
